@Golden_Syrup So it does what a hub is supposed to with all services available in the same place? I don't see the problem.
FORUM
Converse with fellow players
@Golden_Syrup So it does what a hub is supposed to with all services available in the same place? I don't see the problem.
So, it's male only hairstyle? Wow, must be the fifth male version with that arbitrary limitation in the game.
What, don't you enjoy being backstabbed? That is also why you can see through bosses. "Fun" or something.
@ShadowAce Hey, if i could turn off chat, i would. I know you can turn the chat window off, but that doesn't stop the messages from popping up. I can't block every player since there is not enough room on the blocklist.
@Golden_Syrup said in ps02 ngs what it should be and shouldnt be a empty mmo:
To SEGA Development team having a single hub zone where all players start from really isnt any different than the current Ps02 hub design in the ship
example having multiple hub zones ( starting point for players ) in one map there should be a Hub zone and on another map there should be another hub zone this would fill in empty spaces on the world map of NGs
Why fill it just for the sake of it? If they all have the same shops, there is no reason to go between them, and if they don't, it's a stupid limitation just to give it a to reason exist, which wasn't necessary to begin with.
currently, the map only has one hub zone ( one city) this is empty as warframes open world plains of eidolon.
But is it as fake of a version of a hub as warframes pathetic attempt at open world?
The ps02 ngs feels like a solo game than it does a mmo massively multiplayer.
Really? Good.
pve how about utilizing dungeons and dungeon gameplay with time attack features clearing a dungeon before time expires.
Time limits? Ugh...
4 player dungeons 6 player dungeons
You can do most things in a group, why does it have to be forced on people? Let me guess: better rewards, right?
pvp
As we all know(those of us who are honest about it anyway), nothing will make PvP popular enough to justify the expenses wasted on it.
do not make the same mistake as ffxiv where large maps are created that only adds to the emptiness in a map
Hey, as long as it's filled with enemies, i'm happy. Other people would just ruin it.
if the game quality is going down due to not making enough money ps02 ngs should charge players 4 dollars a month to play. This would give the developers incentive to further expand the game.
Monthly fee = I quit. Considering how all scratches seem to sell like hotcakes, i don't think they have a problem with making money. What they do with the money is another thing entirely.
ps02 ngs isnt fun as it could be current ps02 is the boring repetitive cycle of monthly new scratch every month lackluster boss fights that are easy with typical rewards missing mmo dungeons and other game modes that are found in most mmos.
Just like all game as a service games. If you know one that's different, let me know. Since we both know it doesn't exist, no need to bother though.
however taking inspiration from other mmos would be great, as they have certain game designs much more appealing than ps02s.
Unless they do the same as Digital Extremes where they copy things from other games to shoehorn them as a lesser version into warframe.
@ZENCHI-REBORN said in Cheap one shot mechanics are not good game design:
@Yggranya said in Cheap one shot mechanics are not good game design:
@ZENCHI-REBORN So...what does all the other fighting that the game is filled with teach the player? Nothing? Only works if you die? If some moron chooses to ignore game mechanics, and if "facetanking" works as long as it isn't a one-shot, then the developers can only blame themselves for poor game designing. Come on, you can twist it as much as you want but it wouldn't be required if you couldn't heal everything on demand, including death.
The game is as easy as it is and people still complains at the difficulty.
Really? Like where? Or did you just pull that out of your backside just now when it was convenient?
@IAMCRAIG said in Can we not cut out anymore story scenes and stop it with censorship in general.:
Or are you guys still going on about stuff like the slave series being changed to raven, the bathing scene with a 12 year old boy and two 15 year old girls, the scene where one of said 15 year old girls pervs out hard over 12 year old boy, etc.?
Must be another "cultural thing", am i right?
@Milk I'm sure you are aware of this, but just in case. The only thing that would sell better than sexualized...anything would be literal porn. Since that isn't going to happen, this is the next best thing for profit. Which means that it is what it is.