I dislike and avoid most other players because they are garbage people. I use the bots for a few extra heals. Either way, I give everyone else the mutual courtesy of locking the door every time I start a game so we don't have to be bothered by one another. I'd rather solo ultimates than babysit eleven children.

@Nosekyr I've got three, but one I prefer to be pure for a number of reasons.

@coldreactive Try to fanboy a little harder. Maybe they will notice and love you.

So... my aux has stopped calling me Master and has started calling me.. Handler. Oof. Look, I get it. Master, slave, its a bad look. This is 2020, we can move forward. Thing is, the dude saying Handler makes me feel like I'm in some weird submissive dominant relationship with my aux. And maybe that's what some people are going for. Who am I to judge? But the pleasant/gentle personality already has that pretty well covered. If you read the dialog, you could just remove the word for all of the lines and it would be fine. I did my best to meet your expectations, HANDLER. HANDLER, if you have a moment, may I give you my report? Just remove the word completely and it will read normal and won't make me throw up in my mouth a little bit every time I walk into my personal quarters. So.. fix it. We good? Thanks.

I wasn't sure if I should address this under technical issues or bug reports. Technically, I believe the problem is a typo in the article. Could someone please verify?

https://pso2.com/news/announcements/groupchatcampaign0902

Here is the discrepancy:

This gets my vote. Exclusives exclude and damage player morale. I dislike being excluded way more than I want to have something special. I actually maintain a low opinion of people who value exclusivity and feel bad about having things that other people can't obtain. Feels bad. Granted, it doesn't have to be apples to apples per se, you can mix it up. For example, I'd be fine as a steam user paying for a bundle that includes some Xbox exclusives. That door swings both ways. It doesn't have to be free across the board, you can still monetize it, but so long as access is available, people will at least have a choice. No access is a closed door.

@AndrlCh Thank you, sir! I'd only seen support avatars with it and you can't check their look breakdown like you can normal players, so I was stumped. Much appreciated.

Can anyone tell me the name of this body paint? Also, big LOLs for Dave Davidon as pictured here.

Oof. Unfollowing this one. You guys have rabbit trailed hard.

@Vashzaron I think you might be on to something. I have no evidence for this because I'm not interested in exploits in an online game because of the way it can damage the virtual economy, but I do have a theory. If any information about items on the player shop is retained in memory while managing a given shop, theoretically that memory buffer could be overloaded by throwing too much data at it so that the stored information can be manipulated. In theory, this could have any number of impacts on the data stored including changing the item ID to something different entirely. If what they're doing is something similar to this, surely the shops could be modified to simply prohibit the function used to do the exploit so that it is no longer possible. All of this is, as you say, spitballing. But that is a possible explanation. Those jukebox stacks could have been a player overloading the memory buffer to create new items. If I'm right, that means we've got both a duplication glitch and an item generation glitch that will both need to be patched. In any case, that explains where the meseta sellers are getting their resources.

It makes sense that this is a global issue. Sounds like it's something that was present and undetected on the JP side for a long time, discovered more recently, and then found to be also working on the NA side. It was never detected, so its present in both versions. That makes things extremely interesting. Because we're not up to speed with JP yet, each new release will need to be prepatched.