Didn't really pay much attention to previous topics. Read the first post of this topic and many of the responses make me feel sorry for Leonkh99 and Archetype Luna.
Before continuing, I should say I've completed the portion of Episode 4's story quests we have so far (up to chapter 4). I've watched the deleted scene and to me it kind of builds on character relationships. It's not in ways that couldn't be assumed anyway, but considering Episodes 1-3 often felt like they were skipping pages of character interaction I wonder if I'm just used to gaps in writing to the point that removing a scene doesn't feel out of place?
I haven't seen the other two linked scenes because I hear they contain spoilers so I can't consider whether they've got more development or are as likely to be removed.
@PhantasyStar719 said in Potential Reason for the Game's Censorship:
I truly think the subject matter is just getting into distorted noise at this point they continually are spamming new threads trying to keep this "false news" alive.
At least one scene has been removed, correct? That would mean it's not false news (fake news?). Calling it such not only harms your credibility but also that of anything that is correctly called false/fake news.
@PhantasyStar719 said in Potential Reason for the Game's Censorship:
Rain id suggest going to Lunas other threads in the suggestion section and request they get closed too
To me this just comes across as targeted harassment.
It feels like some people here have concluded that the GMs are looking for excuses to close certain topics, and are only too happy to incite drama and uncivil behaviour because they want what would otherwise be a civil discussion to be buried and never spoken of. Which, amusingly, is a malicious form of censorship.
Ultimately we know this scene has been removed. This topic isn't a protest against that, and doesn't actively seek to change it. Leonkh99 has instead sought to provide possible explanations as to why the removal happened, most of which if true would not provide any avenue to challenge the removal but would instead help users understand and potentially accept it.
To me this seems a perfectly responsible and reasonable approach to take. If the GMs or another representative of localisation were to speak up and give a meritorious reason that this scene and potentially others had to be removed, that would provide the substantiation some posters in this topic seek (or have already claimed to exist) to draw a line under the matter in a way that hopefully everyone could accept and move on from.
Wouldn't that be for the best?
I am sorry but I strongly disagree because Luna approach to issues is to incite change through forum bandwagon. It started with SG, then hight and now censors content makes me wonder why so much effort. I understand the pro’s and con’s of these discussions but no solution is accepted even when both side benefits. Luna has a tendency to negate any fair solution that does not fall in his/her agenda and perception. I also have noticed that If the opinions of other perceptions of the censors content is with Sega, Luna tends mock their perspective with content that wasn’t censored as if he/she has a credit masters degree in philosophy and psychology in mental awareness just to strengthen his argument. Kind-of-reminds me of this........ https://youtu.be/hIdsjNGCGz4