Wait what? how does not checking someone about their like of lolis mean we arent willing to back our own arguments by policing each other? That makes zero sense. I dont control what anyone on here does or says nor is it my responsibility to. I back up what i say and what others say when its things i agree with. The people who go off the rails? Thats on them. No matter what side youre on.
You just described it. If the argument isn't about loli or shota and it's about censorship, then it's up to everyone to make sure that it stays on topic. If loli and shota comments are causing people to be accused of being pedophiles, it's especially important. If nobody who sides with them is willing to reign it in or talk with them about why it's off-topic, then nothing is going to change and it's going to tank your argument.
I would do it, but I've tried countless times and it usually falls on deaf ears. Having someone they aren't immediately turned off by talk to them about it (i.e. the "anti" side (still hate those terms lol)) might turn things around drastically and strengthen your argument. That's how self-policing tends to work.
yet most of the people here whove been called a pedo n such (myself included) havent expressed any like for lolis or shotas. I dont see people on the pro side reigning those accusations in. I dont see folks on the anti side throwing out accusations n slandering people like that. These threads dont get confrontational (most times) until someone of the pro side steps in and says something. So its effectively being done on both sides. I dont have to self police adults. Not my job, never will be. Not sure why you hate the terms pro (for) and anti (against), but you do you