Disclose WHY the height limit was put in place

I suggest everyone do the same- he's clearly trying to get the thread locked. Report, Ignore. Being incredibly offensive and just using the same horrific assumption as those banned before him about a group of people just asking for a the same freedoms JP has. He apparently knows things about us that we are not even aware of?... The words are empty for he has those delusions about us that we know for 100% fact are not true.

Shouldn't give him the time of day- but I know it's hard to not defend yourself against such outrageous insults.. I've fallen victim to it myself in many threads.

@MoldyAsp33874 Hey the more shit he says, the better tbh.

If nothing else, it will prove a point on how far people will do wild witch hunts, troll etc and we will just keep posting these threads as long as we can.

This is just egging us on tbh.

@Paladin said in Disclose WHY the height limit was put in place:

I swear to god little man, dont make me find your address, I will do it, and spread it around. You have absolutely no idea how dangerous it is to be labeled a pedophile.

@Paladin said in Disclose WHY the height limit was put in place:

ANd you, need to get your head bashed in so you learn a lesson.

I have sent a support ticket on Paladin in addition to the reports, as he has quite blatantly, threatened people's real life well being's. This would actually warrant legal action if it happened; it potentially can warrant legal action right now if someone actually did feel that their safety was compromised (threatening physical assault is no laughing matter). What he is suggesting to do in his threats is illegal.

This post is deleted!
This post is deleted!

@SleeprunnerInc Yes I believe he is just trying to egg us on, especially me at this point. I am not going to be responding directly to him anymore. If I see any misinformation spread I am going to correct it, but I won't be directly responding to him anymore.

@Paladin said in Disclose WHY the height limit was put in place:

@SleeprunnerInc said in Disclose WHY the height limit was put in place:

@Paladin It's also culturally acceptable to marry underaged people in alot of countries AND have sex with them.

What's your point?

If anything, you are insinuating wild witch hunts which ultimately backfire and lead to you getting on deathrow yourself for trying to raise mobs against people who you got no proof on.

Guess what?

NA Released Game, NA Laws and rules, NA Servers, hosted by a NA Company. You can tout global all you want, its still following our Censorship laws.

Witch hunts of pedophiles is totally acceptable. Reason being, human beings may be on top of the food chain, but we are evolved from our animal/mammal ancestors, where for animals, its perfectly fine to mate with a female of their specifies the instant they show to be in their first heat and are now able to have children, spite they are not full grown or ready yet, thus it may kill them, since they are still adolescent.

But we as Humans, know better. As young as 12 and 13 a human female can start to have children, does not mean she should nor should it be forced on her, nor should she be sought after by sex offending pedophiles like yourself who thinks otherwise In all honesty your just a Weeb who wants to be like Japan because we know better, we are not animals, we know that our children must be protected and raised to make better decisions thus we dont allow it until the age of 18.

Anyone against that, is no better than an Animal.

And that is what you are admitting everytime you raise that bullshit arguement, and why those countries continue to stay backwards, have crap rights for women, and will always be looked at as wrongfully.

So good job, you just admitted your no better than an Animal.

Fun thing is that witch hunts ARE illegal.

What you are suggesting to do is illegal actions which is more than enough to warrant legal action against you.

Not only that, it's not a NA released game, the game is NOT hosted in NA funnily enough as there are servers all around Europe aswell.

It's by definition a GLOBAL GAME hosted by a Japanese company.

Also your censorship laws have been debunked multiple times so you going to falsely quote your laws again?

@Archetype-Luna I don't mind him egging us on.

Honestly it's fun.

@Paladin seriously...cant you stop creating new accounts and only post on weekend when mods arent around?

This post is deleted!

@SleeprunnerInc It's best to not respond directly to him anymore. Simply post correct information if you see them spreading false information. For example, if they try to say there are legal issues with the game going uncensored:

If we refer to the Supreme Court Case, Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, where it presented the question:

The Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 (CPPA), prohibits, inter alia, the shipment, distribution, receipt, reproduction, sale, or possession of any visual depiction that "appears to be[] of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct." 18 U.S.C. 2252A, 2256(8)(B) (Supp. V 1999). It also contains a similar prohibition concerning any visual depiction that is "advertised, promoted, presented, described, or distributed in such a manner that conveys the impression that the material is or contains a visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct." 18 U.S.C. 2252A, 2256(8)(D) (Supp. V 1999). The question presented is whether those prohibitions violate the First Amendment to the Constitution.

In the Supreme Court's ruling, it stated:

The statute is aimed at hard core child pornography and does not apply to innocuous images of naked children. Nor does it reach drawings, cartoons, sculptures, or paintings depicting youthful persons in sexually explicit poses.

As we have discussed, there are several ways to disseminate educational, medical, or artistic works concerning a child's sexuality without violating the CPPA: The Act does not cover drawings, cartoons, sculptures, and paintings that depict youthful-looking persons in sexual poses; it supplies an affirmative defense to persons who disseminate visual depictions involving adults who may appear to be children, provided that the depictions are not promoted or presented as child pornography, 18 U.S.C. 2252A(c) (Supp. V 1999); and the Act does not apply to visual materials in which sexually explicit conduct by children is understood to be taking place, as long as the sexually explicit conduct is not itself visually depicted.

PSO2 would fall under the umbrella of "drawings, cartoons, sculptures, or paintings," and PSO2 does not promote or present itself as child pornography. Thus the legal precedent set by Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, would mean the CPPA would not apply to PSO2.

I have this in my censorship thread for easy access.

This post is deleted!

@Paladin You know what American culture is?

America is supposed to be a MELTING POT OF DIFFERENT CULTURES.

Not only that, the origin history of america was based on a group of radical religious nuts who got driven outta Britain, went to teh DUTCH, who took the pilgrims in who then left to found America AFTER getting lost on their way by a few thousand miles and ended up somewhere completely else than where they were supposed to get to.


This post is deleted!

Oh my gosh, what's goin on here 😂 RIP thread, that guy dropped a nuke bomb. He is... insane 😰

This post is deleted!