@Kurumi-Tokisaki said in Better Block Organization?:
@Kos said in Better Block Organization?:
Designated blocks on JP DO work though, when the content specific to them is actually relevant and worth running. Whenever there was a ult quest boost, the ultimate quests block would be full from people wanting to run ult quests, for example. Even just designating by difficulty, something incredibly basic, would go a long way to help.
Still hurts the current population who made block X their home, and if Block 1,2,3,7,8,10,17, 34 or 50 of Ship 1 was designated for 'anything' useful, it'd never be able to get people for that content since those are where stragglers usually end up and communicate filling the block with no purpose other than to socialize in mind or get people for random groups XD.
I can relate to that as my alliance's homeblock was 34 before B51-80 were gutted. Now it's full to the extent that half of our members can't even get in anymore because they're not prem, so we just decided to move two blocks down and set that up as our new point. Hell, my friend's alliance who I hang out with had their home in B77 but that got nuked. But there's no harm in adapting imo, especially if they decide to mimic JP and cut our main (PC/Xbox) blocks down to 39 in the future as well or god forbid even lower at this rate.
I do agree that nothing will likely change in B1, B2, B34, etc but I wouldn't really mind, in fact I see that as a good thing if people are still congregating there in spite of the recommended designation. But it wouldn't hurt to have the more currently-desolate blocks in the 20s or 40s to have designations for casino and stuff.