The censorship on being short should be removed.

@Lemon-Sama

and is by far the most popular by a very large margin.

Yeah..? sure, guess what?

There is a game you will never see me playing. To each his or her own interests

I like my Phantasy Star Online 2 like a great steak.. Matured and ready for consumption. As it stands it is edging on unnecessary lewdness but not quite fully there thankfully... Also we have gender organs in this game.

What people are asking for, It just does not feel appropriate given the overall context of things.

..*Insert random THIS IS A CHRISTIAN SERVER! meme *..

(Crude way of saying NA doesn't need to be told they're wrong for doing what they do)

The previous pso2 picture posted is edging on young enough, it doesn't need to get any edgier than that. My opinion.

@Ganguro I don't think you made this thread out of feeling like you're being censored for "being short." Looking through your post history you made the following thread:

pedophile confirmed?

Your intentions are pretty obvious, and for those blissfully unaware of what "loli" is "Loli may refer to: Lolita (term), the sexual portrayal of young girls."

The creeps on block 2 that make the loli porn symbol arts don't need more fuel.

So no actual content is being censored. There is just a hight restriction on how short you can make a character? They havent changed any cosmetics or anything like that?

@Senketsu7

I'm not entirely sure about the cosmetics or the details regarding the story content though that aside, essentially yes.

@SleeprunnerInc I can respect that. I like that they are taking our feedback into consideration though, even if they can't please everyone.

@Lemon-Sama Are you serious? How can anyone produce statistics on people that play a young girl class because it does it for them? Has there been any study for or against it? This is all anecdotal for both sides of the fence.

As far as the example, I'm not sure how you think that a class specifically made up of characters that appear to be young girls but are "actually" 1000 years old makes a solid case against creeps wanting to play it.

I'm also well aware that it's not just creeps that want to play short or tall characters, but that it's possibly enough of a concern that a cap would be implemented (if that is the reason it's there).

@Senketsu7 said in The censorship on being short should be removed.:

So no actual content is being censored. There is just a hight restriction on how short you can make a character? They havent changed any cosmetics or anything like that?

depending on what people considers "actual content".

Some don't care about cosmetics, so things like character height or the free smart inner on JP to hide your inner wear on some base wears for layering is no big deal.

Some people skips all story so scenes that were removed or the changes to what characters are wearing in cutscenes is no problem.

@plamplight said in The censorship on being short should be removed.:

@Ganguro I don't think you made this thread out of feeling like you're being censored for "being short." Looking through your post history you made the following thread:

pedophile confirmed?

Your intentions are pretty obvious, and for those blissfully unaware of what "loli" is "Loli may refer to: Lolita (term), the sexual portrayal of young girls."

The creeps on block 2 that make the loli porn symbol arts don't need more fuel.

Like how you go through my history just to pick of fight and bring out the oh what if statements. I've got nothing to hide. I literally said I wanted to make a short adorable character. There's nothing inappropriate about my character. I view her as cute. I don't view her as anything other. Ever heard of lolita and lolita fashion?

Screenshot_20200808-175042_copy_1080x1420.png

@Redex You put it very well. I love that we can be lewd and express ourselves that way if we so please, but I've seen enough already to know that this isn't such an innocent request. lol

@Senketsu7 There was the removal of a free Innerwear, the Smart Inner, which will likely also result in at least two other Innerwear that are based on it not being released, one cutscene has been edited to put clothes on a character that initially appeared nude, and a cutscene was removed that featured characters wearing only towels in a bath (which is also an indication that two other similar scenes from Episode 4's epilogue will be removed),

@Ganguro Lolita fashion and lolita are two completely different things.

One is about expressing a certain look through fashion, while the other is about expressing oneself through age. Not saying either has to be sexual, but they're not the same.

@ApollosAmour said in The censorship on being short should be removed.:

@Ganguro Lolita fashion and lolita are two completely different things.

One is about expressing a certain look through fashion, while the other is about expressing oneself through age. Not saying either has to be sexual, but they're not the same.

That's all I view it as through my eyes.

@Ganguro That's fine, but they're two different things despite the namesake. People that are into loli don't usually care about BTSSB or moi~meme~moite in my experience.

Just to add to the whole loli thing, I use to think loli just meant short and cute, like petite or somethen, same with shota. Never knew before that it had to do with actually being young/underage >_< but lolita isn't related to loli right?

@Clain loli and lolita means the same thing but used differently i think. but if your thinking of the definition that plamp used than no he probably ripped that straight outta wikipedia which ultimately isn't known for its accurate information. And yes i checked wikipedia.